@cee-dee wrote:
It also illustrates how lacking the jury are on aspects of evidentiary matters? However, I think the judge waffled on too much and for too long in summing up, problably confusing the jurors rather than helping them?
I'd agree. And surely, after over 5 days deliberation and no result, the judge should move towards accepting a majority verdict? The stress of this past week must have been unimaginable for a man of Rolf's age.
