That relates to anonymity issues which is where your muddle began so im afraid that is another fail
What I clearly said was not what you posted, though that is nothing unusual
I said I do not accept your limited terms and usage because it fails to cover what can be quite wide ranging issues. That means it's over simplified and not much real use.

As I don't believe there is  any real interest apart from the usual shoe scuffing and bottom lip exercises, any further elaboration is rather pointless, but the issues are fairly self-evident and not some Surrey revelation

I was always taught that during debates you never ask a question that you don't know the answer to.

might explain why the learning curve went horizontal then at an early stage

If you anyone had any genuine interest then I would expect them to be able to express it in a clear and honest way, not to have to squirm their way to whatever exit they can find.

it highlighted the plight of women both in this country and others and how it is related

:^O

I must have fallen asleep with boredom and missed that bit. Perhaps include world peace and a nobel prize there as well


 

Am I missing something here?  You have put my argument in a nutshell.

Quite a lot really lol
Bit sad for you then that others can put in a nutshell your position in a few lines and it takes you several posts whilst still not being able to do so. Positions that have to be drawn out like removing teeth have little bite