You have stated quite clearly that you don't believe this

Again you are putting in words that were not said because others dont agree with you.

so its distortion time again. What I said was I dont agree with your terms and usage and believe it's an over simplification, and it would have been better at the forefront of your question had you been actually interested, not clouded by reference to anonymity for unknown purposes

I doubt you have any idea most of the time other something you can retreat from by any method available, and claimincoherence was all some pre-determined plan lol.

If as you claim you know that reporting rates will drop and that offenders will therefore not be prosecuted then why frame your question that way since you later claim to know the answer?
If additionally it's to point out that the following as you say, then why confuse it with anonymity rights?

Quite frankly some cases will go unreported even with anonymity, but if as you say

 it is because of society's attitude towards the victim and the victims own self esteem conditioned by society's attitude.,

then why say

after all we don't live in a third world country where women who are raped or assaulted have anything to be "ashamed" of.

It's rather disingenuous/muddled/confused to put forward both of those since you appear to believe the latter ought to be the case, but seem to say the former is the case.

Victims  respond to their situation, not your muddle

Far more honest to put your position and question honestly rather than perpetually "hoof" it all the time


If you are actually concerned rather than pedant picking because life is too unbearable without some distraction, then I suggest as before you discuss the matter with the agencies concerned.I am sure they would  be delighted to hear your views, assuming you can manage to shape them into some coherent  form without being prompted by others