I doubt you could tell the difference.

That is your orginal post.

Looking at it from the other angle I would ask the question as to why the name of the victim is kept secret in such cases - after all we don't live in a third world country where women who are raped or assaulted have anything to be "ashamed" of.

That says nothing about your so-called later position. Either it's incredibly naive, or extremely muddled to use your own terms

If you already know the answers as you later claim, then why pose the question in such a way in the first place only to have to retreat into more specifics when challenged?

Far better and far more honest to make it clear in the first place

I answer in the way I choose, not you. If I don't accept your terms and usage there are good reasons for not doing so since I don't believe they address the issue suitably and ought to be fairly well understood by anyone of reasonable intelligence whose life doesn't revolve around low level pedantry in a vague hope of believing like the 'nutter on the bus' that the last post must win

The answer to those not covered by the above is already there and quite self-evident