The film proved he was with his wife all the time.

Actually no it doesn't. The word used in the article is SUGGESTS.
Very different.
It's incremental legal value appears small.It's theatrical value slightly more

Not sure why some of the public deem certain celebs innocent, almost because they are celebs, but it appears so.
Possibly as some seem to live their life vicariously via such celebs, they feel a certain 'attachment'
As for Keir Starmers article ( pity it didn't quite make the Wrexam tard, or Cheshire Chav) I Would add, the vast majority of cases go through a magistrates conveyor belt system, some moving to CC.Of those the majority will never make national press, and possibly not even local, unless they contain some especially salacious aspect
So what you are talking about is a very small number of cases involving a minor celeb or two
I think that ought to be seen in context

Some need to get over the myth that there is a huge number of mainly females just waiting to make false allegations, against a few poor old celebs
About as genuine as cyber sheep