@sir_arthur_strebe-grebling wrote:As with Roache, the Police and CPS piled together as many charges as they could, hoping they could smear the defendant and make people assume he must be guilty.
Thankfully, the jury, in both cases, saw through this ploy, and found that the 'evidence' was insufficient to convict Roache and Travis.
As with Roache, the police and CPS gathered as much evidence as they could, confident they could rightly accuse the defendant and rightly charge said defendant with horrid crimes, yet they were foiled by a lawyer who was more adept in finding loopholes (possibly someone like Nick Freeman??)
Sadly, the jury, in both cases, were duped by the extremely adept, incredibly highly-paid lawyer (hired by the defendants, obviously, who have more money and can afford to do so), and found that the evidence was (tragically) insufficient to reach the justified verdict.
