Eh?
Are you being serious? If not then fair play, this is a great wind-up.
Whether I have read it or not is irrelevant, I mentioned it in response to someone posting a link to a GROUCHO Marx clip. It was in no way a critique of a political theory. It was a joke based on the fact that the author has the same name as famous comedian.
You assume a hell of a lot after mis-interpreting a joke.
And your post is self-contradictory - you don't think I have read it, then you think I have read it then failed to understand it?
[PS If you really must get into a what-have-you-read what-have-I-read match, then bring it on. I'll see your Marx and Engel's Communuist Manifesto and raise you Solzhenistyn's Gulag Archipelago.]
____________________________________________________
If someone was trying to explain something to you, and said 'You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink', they are almost certainly trying to illustrate a point, rather than personally critiquing your equine persuasion skills.
