Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-12-2013 3:25 PM
@blackburn_stevie wrote:
OK (Steps out from behind parapet) What is better for the baby? That has to be the first concern. We are not told how bad the woman's mental illness is. To put it bluntly, she could be anywhere between a person with Schizophrenia symptoms with multiple personalities and somebody with mild Depression.
So just imagine that you are the people looking after the mother's other 2 kids and that the mother is at the worse end of the scale shown above. You probably have a legal right to tell the doctors dealing with the baby's delivery how to proceed. They are probably the ones who gave the order for the caesarian delivery.
The next question is .....
Why is anybody else butting their noses into it?
Cheers,
Steve.
(Ducks back down)
At a county court hearing in Chelmsford in February this year Judge Roderick Newton heard the mother beg that she should not lose her child for ever.
The judge ruled the girl should be placed for adoption – even though he accepted that the mother was well, successfully taking medication and had a job.
He said the mother might stop taking her drugs and the family offers were ‘not a starter’.
Sir James Munby, who is the President of the Family Division of the High Court, ordered yesterday that further moves towards adoption must be heard before him in the High Court.
......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .................Im a 76 year old Nutcase.. TOMMY LOVES YOU ALL. .. I'm a committed atheist.
