So, it's GAL is it?

cee-dee
Guide

‎24-07-2013 6:23 PM

George Alexander Louis.

 

I wonder if they realised he'll be called GAL?


It's life Jim, but not as WE know it.
Live long and prosper.

0 Helpful

sir_arthur_strebe-grebling
Engager

‎24-07-2013 6:28 PM

Better than William Arthur George. Smiley Wink

0 Helpful

cee-dee
Guide
In response to sir_arthur_strebe-grebling

‎24-07-2013 6:30 PM

Only marginally better than George Alexander Yorath?


It's life Jim, but not as WE know it.
Live long and prosper.

0 Helpful

sir_arthur_strebe-grebling
Engager
In response to cee-dee

‎24-07-2013 6:34 PM

Perhaps it will inspire some parents to give their children proper names, instead of Wayne, Darren, Jayden, Connor, etc

0 Helpful

charliebird123
Contributor
In response to sir_arthur_strebe-grebling

‎24-07-2013 6:36 PM

I wouldn't bet on it.Man LOL

Wherever i wander i follow our team,
the famous Sunderland, a love supreme.
0 Helpful

geographically*challenged
Engager
In response to sir_arthur_strebe-grebling

‎24-07-2013 6:58 PM

Wayne & Darren are ok but the ther names where do they come from???? Just plucked from a pile of letters and thrown in the air?



0 Helpful

Anonymous
Not applicable

‎24-07-2013 7:00 PM

just as well his first name was'nt Henry, then he would be HAL...................................2001?

0 Helpful

cee-dee
Guide
In response to Anonymous

‎24-07-2013 8:00 PM

Harry's proper name is Henry?


It's life Jim, but not as WE know it.
Live long and prosper.

0 Helpful

mr-expresso
Engager
In response to cee-dee

‎25-07-2013 9:48 AM

Well at least they didn't call him after the King of England who reigned from 1016 to 1035...... If they had he could start a fashion trend to rival FCUK........

________________________________________________________________

Ignore anything under this ^^^^^ line... It's just my signature....
0 Helpful

cee-dee
Guide
In response to mr-expresso

‎25-07-2013 10:00 AM

Not if you put a line above the sig.


It's life Jim, but not as WE know it.
Live long and prosper.

0 Helpful

mr-expresso
Engager
In response to cee-dee

‎25-07-2013 10:22 AM

@cee-dee wrote:

Not if you put a line above the sig.

I know ... But if I did that then I couldn't have it as my sig...Smiley Happy

Spoiler
 

 

________________________________________________________________

Ignore anything under this ^^^^^ line... It's just my signature....
0 Helpful

cee-dee
Guide
In response to mr-expresso

‎25-07-2013 10:34 AM

You could change it to "No point in having a sig now because it looks as though it is part of the post unless you add a line like clever folks". bravo


It's life Jim, but not as WE know it.
Live long and prosper.

0 Helpful

rose2008-2008
Helper
In response to cee-dee

‎25-07-2013 2:38 PM

I like Alexander, not sure about the rest   Woman Frustrated ha ha ha.

 

Woman LOLWoman LOLWoman LOL

0 Helpful