Is this a fair decision?.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-02-2014 9:15 AM
Some of the comments underneath the article disagree.
http://www.parentdish.co.uk/2014/02/07/dog-owner-found-not-guilty-after-his-pet-mauled-toddler/
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-02-2014 9:58 AM
**********Sam**********
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-02-2014 11:01 AM
It was very unfortunate but the biggest fault lies with the parents of the child ......a 3 year old should NOT be wandering around unsupervised in a pub ...absolutely anything could have happened and although the dog bite was bad events could have been much worse.
The dog could have inflicted severe ( even fatal ) injuries on the child of it was in full attack mode and although no one can say for certain what really happened it would appear that this was not a full on attack by a vicious dog.
I am a dog owner and although I am confident that my dog would not attack a child ( even strangers are welcomed into the house by her ) I know that she could cause accidental damage to a small and vulnerable child as she is boisterous , big and has sharp claws that could easily inflict when she gets excited and jumps around .
Children and dogs can be a toxic mix .....in this instance the child was very lucky ....but if the dog has no previous history of aggression and has not displayed any such behaviour since ( and no one knows what the child did to the dog ) then it must be viewed as a very unfortunate incidence .
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-02-2014 11:29 AM
**********Sam**********
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-02-2014 2:16 PM
Yes, I think it was fair. I have been in cafės and restaurants where sprogs have been left to run wild, while their parents have been fiddling around on mobile phones. Were they to run into a waitress/waiter carrying hot food and drinks and were then scalded, whose fault would it be ?
I suppose the waitress/waiter's fault, for not looking where they were going.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-02-2014 5:56 PM
Yes, I think it's the right decision. I blame the parents 100% for not minding their child. They can't have been attentive if the child managed to get into a private part of the pub and jump on a sleeping dog.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-02-2014 10:46 PM
The parents are to blame. The child should not have been wandering around on his own, into private rooms or anywhere else. The dog had a right to be there, the little boy did not. The dog was asleep and the child jumped on him to play. I may have lashed out too in those circumstances.
I don't think kids should be allowed in pubs any way. With all the fuss being kicked up about smoking around children ( which I agree with totally ), but it's OK to expose them to alcohol / drinking / drunks. Besides that, there is nothing worse than going for a quiet drink or a nice meal, and having screeching kids running around. Once, a little girl came over to our table and snatched food off my plate. The parents thought it hilarious.
That said, I wish the little one well. He's not old enough to know better so it wasn't his fault either.
crooksnanny ~ maz
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
13-02-2014 1:15 PM
I think its the right decision the dog snapped it didn't attack there is a differnce, I would be very careful with the dog in the future though especialy around children.
No sig can't be bothered.