NO LONGER SELLING DUE TO SIMPLE DELIVERY

AS OF 15TH APRIL MY DAYS AS A PRIVATE EBAY SELLER WILL STOP AFTER 19 YEARS.

I AM FED UP OF THE GREED OF EBAY AND I HOPE OTHER EBAY SELLERS DECIDE TO NO LONGER LET THE EBAY CONTROL FREAKS HAVE THIS MUCH CONTROL OVER PRIVATE SELLERS.

Message 1 of 1,772
See Most Recent
1,771 REPLIES 1,771

Re: NO LONGER SELLING DUE TO SIMPLE DELIVERY

I too have removed all listings and will not post until eBay come to their senses and allow me to use whatever postal service I choose.

Message 281 of 1,772
See Most Recent

Re: NO LONGER SELLING DUE TO SIMPLE DELIVERY

I agree totally. The lack of choice is forcing me to stop selling on eBay unless they change their plans.

Don’t forget that eBay are now making money on the insurance fee that they charge buyers which kind of replaces the final value fee that they used to charge sellers. They only have to pay out on insurance if something is lost or damaged, if the item is delivered successfully they’ve made money from that charge. Also, if you send something via Royal Mail Tracked 48 service without a signature, the item is insured for up to £100 make the eBay insurance fee totally unnecessary as the item would have been insured twice!

Message 282 of 1,772
See Most Recent

Re: NO LONGER SELLING DUE TO SIMPLE DELIVERY

Items under £10 and weighing 100g or under (a letter basically)

Message 283 of 1,772
See Most Recent

Re: NO LONGER SELLING DUE TO SIMPLE DELIVERY

It's actually worse than that @jjambadger27  

 

Evri's terms and conditions state that there is no compensation for loss or damage to vinyl records.

 

Near the end of their lengthy exclusion list - 

  • Memorabilia, photographs, signed items and vinyl records

 

In the terms and conditions of SD, eBay states that it is up to the seller to ensure that the items he is selling can be sent with that courier.

 

So what do you do? If you block Evri, and only accept RM, your buyers will be charged a higher rate. Yet, if you send with Evri, you have no compensation cover for items which may have considerable value.

 

eBay have stated they will step in if items are lost or damaged, but I don't know if that will include items which are expressly excluded by the carrier. I would imagine they have a get-out clause for such cases.

 

 

Message 284 of 1,772
See Most Recent

Re: NO LONGER SELLING DUE TO SIMPLE DELIVERY

I use thin card and plastic sleeve

Message 285 of 1,772
See Most Recent

Re: NO LONGER SELLING DUE TO SIMPLE DELIVERY

I've decided to put my sales on hold from the *14th April - this will go for my purchases on here too - i'd like to suggest that everybody else do the same - ebay need a short sharp kick up the wotsits to make them actually take notice of the upset that they're causing.

 

*make that the 7th of April.

 

#boycottebay

Message 286 of 1,772
See Most Recent

Re: NO LONGER SELLING DUE TO SIMPLE DELIVERY

Totally agree with you, I've removed all my listings and unless eBay keep the current postage structure that's how it will remain, other online selling platforms are available.

Message 287 of 1,772
See Most Recent

Re: NO LONGER SELLING DUE TO SIMPLE DELIVERY

Looks like ebay have blocked all forums to do with simple delivery. One you started  ‘no longer selling etc’ stopped early this morning at page 14

Message 288 of 1,772
See Most Recent

Re: NO LONGER SELLING DUE TO SIMPLE DELIVERY

Obviously don't like what they're hearing 

Message 289 of 1,772
See Most Recent

Re: NO LONGER SELLING DUE TO SIMPLE DELIVERY

Really?...the egreed dictatorship is in full flow this morning if so.

Message 290 of 1,772
See Most Recent

Re: NO LONGER SELLING DUE TO SIMPLE DELIVERY

Wouldn’t let me reply  so we used different heading but landed on this page above???.  Now at p 15

 

Message 291 of 1,772
See Most Recent

Re: NO LONGER SELLING DUE TO SIMPLE DELIVERY

Your post was the spurt I needed and I thank you for making it.  I'm coming over to Ebid to join you as I'm fed up with the eBay strangulation policies. Just finding my feet!

Message 292 of 1,772
See Most Recent

Re: NO LONGER SELLING DUE TO SIMPLE DELIVERY

I have messaged Eve Williams and Jamie lannone to highlight the issues with Simple Delivery, although I am not hopeful I will get a reply

Message 293 of 1,772
See Most Recent

Re: NO LONGER SELLING DUE TO SIMPLE DELIVERY

06/04/25

 

E-DAY

 

 

Message 294 of 1,772
See Most Recent

Re: NO LONGER SELLING DUE TO SIMPLE DELIVERY

Someone needs to point to Ebay that charging customers a buyer protection charge may be illegal if they are already covered under current consumer law and they fail to make that clear .  I think it could  even be mis-representation 

 

I am not a legal  expert but as Ebay have declared war on their long term loyal customers both sellers and buyers , its only fair that we fight back .

 

Worth contacting your local trading standards officer as eventually the mud might stick .

 

 

 

Even for sellers it effectively a charge as it lowers the potential sale value 

Message 295 of 1,772
See Most Recent

Re: NO LONGER SELLING DUE TO SIMPLE DELIVERY

That's what i need to do concentrate on there instead of trying to make sense of this debacle if i don't list i won't sell 

Message 296 of 1,772
See Most Recent

Re: NO LONGER SELLING DUE TO SIMPLE DELIVERY

Love this 🤣..oops must use 10 characters or more

Message 297 of 1,772
See Most Recent

Re: NO LONGER SELLING DUE TO SIMPLE DELIVERY

They have been in trouble with the law 5 years ago i was shocked when i read it, just hope the lawyers are top notch this time they failed then 😊

Message 298 of 1,772
See Most Recent

Re: NO LONGER SELLING DUE TO SIMPLE DELIVERY

Its always worth Emailing  the Ebay CEO 

 I found this address on the internet and sent a few comments yesterday , so far it has not  bounced back so a fair chance it  could be correct ,  his name is Jamie Iannone 

jiannobe@ebay.com

 

 

Message 299 of 1,772
See Most Recent

Re: NO LONGER SELLING DUE TO SIMPLE DELIVERY


@gmij1961 wrote:

Someone needs to point to Ebay that charging customers a buyer protection charge may be illegal if they are already covered under current consumer law and they fail to make that clear .  I think it could  even be mis-representation 

 

I am not a legal  expert but as Ebay have declared war on their long term loyal customers both sellers and buyers , its only fair that we fight back .

 

Worth contacting your local trading standards officer as eventually the mud might stick .

 

 

 

Even for sellers it effectively a charge as it lowers the potential sale value 


Buyers are only fully covered by consumer laws when buying from business sellers, not private sellers. 

Message 300 of 1,772
See Most Recent
Got selling related questions? Start here: