<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is anyone else unhappy with eBay's new messaging system ??? in Technical Issues</title>
    <link>https://community.ebay.co.uk/t5/Technical-Issues/Is-anyone-else-unhappy-with-eBay-s-new-messaging-system/m-p/7718109#M29277</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This is exactly what has happened - App design vs PC uses.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Having spent years in senior management, this smacks of some bright spark(s) having a rush of &lt;A href="mailto:s@*t" target="_blank"&gt;sh*t&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;to the brain with eager eyes on some promotion over cleverly 'remedying' complaints from (proportionally) a handful of eBay users in relation to a messaging system that wasn't perfect but did work and was accepted (I entirely agree with you irritation over the non-threading of received and sent messages - what a 'clunky' nonsense that was).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What has evolved is a less than user friendly messaging system that has cost a lot of money to design and implement without anyone in middle management putting the brakes on during design process.&amp;nbsp; Most of the budget having been spent; going back by scrapping this new plan might be seen as failure.&amp;nbsp; Then, when some lazy more senior manager is shown it on a smart phone and adopts it enough to sign it off to final stages; it soon becomes much like the 'Emperor's new clothes' and to justify the manpower and expense (even if the project was contracted out) a good but brief presentation without focus on any shortcomings is passed by very senior managers .&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Test it on the people." "Don't provide an option to Switch back to Classic view, that way they'll soon get used to it."&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;. . . . . . . . . . . . . until down the line, it proves so sustainably awful that another budget has to be agreed by the powers-that-be to MAYBE do something about it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Meanwhile (thankfully for the management) the people who were paid to produce such a dreadful system have since moved on.&amp;nbsp; Fortunately it all happened in a previous financial year that had " . . . . precious little to do with me".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rolling it out/testing it and asking for feedback WHILST choosing to deny the user the ability to 'Switch back' is a hostile approach to achieving user friendliness.&amp;nbsp; They realise most would switch back and that way they wouldn't get the (free of cost) feedback from the Users they treat (foolishly) as idiots.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bad management I am afraid.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A well run company would and do admit mistakes are made. eBay must have some good people, hopefully they keep their jobs . . . . . . . . . but in Business Management, not in the I.T department.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ed.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:52:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gtscollections</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-11-26T12:52:49Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

