<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Question Re: The relevance of postage feedback in Member To Member Support DO NOT DELETE</title>
    <link>https://community.ebay.co.uk/t5/Member-To-Member-Support-DO-NOT/The-relevance-of-postage-feedback/qaa-p/5010932#M293085</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Ebay are happy to look at any suggestions,so send them here,&lt;A href="http://ocsnext.ebay.co.uk/ocs/cuhome" target="_blank"&gt;http://ocsnext.ebay.co.uk/ocs/cuhome&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 14:14:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>plum993</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-09-17T14:14:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>The relevance of postage feedback</title>
      <link>https://community.ebay.co.uk/t5/Member-To-Member-Support-DO-NOT/The-relevance-of-postage-feedback/qaq-p/5010927</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;When I return feedback I always feel that the aspect of postage is not specific enough. When its free postage, then feedback for postage is correctly barred.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;However evaluating postage when paying for it seems opaque when it could have had clarity. Being less specific makes the feedback inaccurate or vague. SO WHY NOT:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Postage free of charge - automatic 5 stars&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Postage is less than expected rates 4 stars&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Postage is spot on cost&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3 stars&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Postage is more than cost&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2 stars&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Postage is excessively expensive &amp;nbsp; 1 star&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;NB POSTAGE includes packaging.The seller's effort of lodging packages with couriers is deemed as necessary and not quantifiable.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;This kind of feedback would encourage the very theme Ebay has promoted for many years "free postage".&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;U&gt;I could say the same thing for sellers communication&lt;/U&gt;.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Confirmation of order received and despatch, queries answered quickly rate 5 stars&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Confirmation of order received, queries answered promptly&amp;nbsp; but despatch not confirmed 4 stars&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;NO confirmations, or slow to answer queries 3 Stars&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Inaccurate but regular communication&amp;nbsp; 2 stars&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;No responses to queries , no confirmations &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1 star&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 14:12:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ebay.co.uk/t5/Member-To-Member-Support-DO-NOT/The-relevance-of-postage-feedback/qaq-p/5010927</guid>
      <dc:creator>vicenci.mawdsley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-17T14:12:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The relevance of postage feedback</title>
      <link>https://community.ebay.co.uk/t5/Member-To-Member-Support-DO-NOT/The-relevance-of-postage-feedback/qaa-p/5010932#M293085</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ebay are happy to look at any suggestions,so send them here,&lt;A href="http://ocsnext.ebay.co.uk/ocs/cuhome" target="_blank"&gt;http://ocsnext.ebay.co.uk/ocs/cuhome&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 14:14:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ebay.co.uk/t5/Member-To-Member-Support-DO-NOT/The-relevance-of-postage-feedback/qaa-p/5010932#M293085</guid>
      <dc:creator>plum993</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-17T14:14:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

