<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: eBay recently changed policy and is now Forcing Returns in Community Platform Discussion</title>
    <link>https://community.ebay.co.uk/t5/Community-Platform-Discussion/eBay-recently-changed-policy-and-is-now-Forcing-Returns/m-p/7587449#M2579</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Noticed so many of these threads lately where a business seller masquerading as a private seller is complaining about something fairly trivial.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even if you had "no returns" on your listings, you'd still need to accept returns most of the time anyway as Ebay will usually side with the buyer.&amp;nbsp; It happened to a friend of mine who had an expensive item returned even though it was not deemed "&lt;EM&gt;significantly&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;not as described", and they are a genuine private seller who've only ever sold a few things before.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:54:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>litp*records</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-03-21T21:54:07Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

