<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: UK Community Update in Community Platform Discussion</title>
    <link>https://community.ebay.co.uk/t5/Community-Platform-Discussion/UK-Community-Update/m-p/6888477#M209</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="book antiqua,palatino" size="4" color="#0000FF"&gt;Thank you for your reply, I followed that OK &lt;STRONG&gt;BUT&lt;/STRONG&gt;..... you knew there was going to a "but"?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="book antiqua,palatino" size="4" color="#0000FF"&gt;As mentioned above, it's the order the threads are appearing that's the main bugbear and there's been no explanation of why it was done that way or why the thread order can't be put back the way it was before.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:20:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cee-dee</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-25T16:20:46Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

