<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: I'm 53, disabled, no C.C. to verify age and likely wouldn't qualify for one. Had Ebay account 22 in Buying</title>
    <link>https://community.ebay.co.uk/t5/Buying/I-m-53-disabled-no-C-C-to-verify-age-and-likely-wouldn-t-qualify/m-p/7916841#M78533</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If I stopped to think for a second? I’d read the legal requirements again and go, the &amp;nbsp;courts wouldnt think the age of the eBay account classes as due diligence&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The board of directors of a company won’t really like the risk of a fine or imprisonment so will do the quickest thing to ensure that isn’t likely to happen.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i accept ebay could allow more ID verification&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I accept ebay are being more risk averse than they should over what constitutes a bladed item&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but they absolutely should not accept the age of the eBay account as proof of age of the buyer given the law as it is currently written.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2025 08:31:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jonatjonatjonat</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-08-24T08:31:06Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

