<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Grass is Greener for a Buyer. in Buying</title>
    <link>https://community.ebay.co.uk/t5/Buying/Grass-is-Greener-for-a-Buyer/m-p/7912234#M78255</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have to agree with you on descriptions, or the lack of them. As you say there may only be one photo provided and a brief 'very good' condition. I did buy a skirt on the site once listed as ' as new'. On arrival there was a big hole poorly repaired by hand which was not mentioned at all. I did get my money back without needing to&amp;nbsp; return it but the seller then said 'I hope you can still get some use out of it! Luckily you can block buyers on the site so that you do not get the sellers items showing in future searches.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another issue with their searches is if I search for items I am interested in, away from clothes, I still end up with listings with women doing selfies of themselves modelling their items. Some leave little to the imagination!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Overall, I would definitely say it appears to be okay as a seller's site but buyers beware.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 10:19:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>treetopsminicottages</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-08-15T10:19:27Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

