<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Grass is Greener for a Buyer. in Buying</title>
    <link>https://community.ebay.co.uk/t5/Buying/Grass-is-Greener-for-a-Buyer/m-p/7911049#M78185</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I use the site you mentioned a few times now. My 3 issues with it are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Sellers have a full week to dispatch items so if say, you buy friday evening, the seller has two weekends and a full week to dispatch. If they do not meet the timescale they can request any week...really?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. If there is an issue, for example, returns are a nightmare. The default return label is inpost , but I have no lockers within walking distance, and it is expected the buyer, not the seller, is expected to pay the return postage even if the seller made the mistake.&amp;nbsp; f you are lucky the seller may agree to pay but there is no obligation unlike this site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This leads me to 3. If an item is returned for a refund the buyer can not leave any feedback at all to reflect their poor experience.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Other than that I am happy with the site but yes it needs a forum!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 09:40:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>treetopsminicottages</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-08-13T09:40:35Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

