<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Buyer says watch ‘does not fit’ in Seller Central</title>
    <link>https://community.ebay.co.uk/t5/Seller-Central/Buyer-says-watch-does-not-fit/m-p/7957348#M762036</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am going to refuse it today, was letting it stew in my head for a little while first!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;yes, it’s clear buyers remorse, and I’m grateful he didn’t abuse (or know to abuse) the not as described function.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’ve heard stories in the watch communities of people buying second hand, replacing the movements and then returning them. Also the warranty is virtually nulled now in my eyes - I have no idea if he’s tampered with the watch which would void the warranty. And then there is the fact that he’s potentially caused damage to the watch with his handling and attempt to replace the links.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;like you say, why doesn’t he just take it to the jewellers! If he wants his money back he’ll have to try and sell it now himself.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 07:24:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>fredley1234</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-11-14T07:24:51Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

