<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NO LONGER SELLING DUE TO SIMPLE DELIVERY in Seller Central</title>
    <link>https://community.ebay.co.uk/t5/Seller-Central/NO-LONGER-SELLING-DUE-TO-SIMPLE-DELIVERY/m-p/7916924#M753210</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Just noticed something interesting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A seller is not using the labels generated by Simple Delivery that have been paid for by the buyers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I bought some items from him. After a few weeks eBay is refunding the SD postage cost to the buyer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How does that work exactly?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If we refuse to use the SD labels are our buyers automatically refunded? If we were going to pay for the postage ourselves are we as sellers refunded for not using the SD labels.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This sounds too good to be true. If we simply ignore SD does the SD problem go away?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2025 11:45:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>4minutemile</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-08-24T11:45:06Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

