<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Simple delivery - is there any way around it? in Seller Central</title>
    <link>https://community.ebay.co.uk/t5/Seller-Central/Simple-delivery-is-there-any-way-around-it/m-p/7867855#M738872</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Very helpful indeed, thank you J.P.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did see a user say "With Simple Delivery, the item would be covered for damage in transit, or loss by the carrier" which I thought was a risky statement to make, considering all of the conversations of late, and indeed Marco from eBay including links to the SD exemptions in his response to your very valid questions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Until we're seen a proven track record of ebay providing compensation for electrical items etc, I would suggest alternative postage would be a better course of action.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2025 10:33:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dls-online</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-08T10:33:20Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

