<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Simple delivery - is there any way around it? in Seller Central</title>
    <link>https://community.ebay.co.uk/t5/Seller-Central/Simple-delivery-is-there-any-way-around-it/m-p/7867843#M738865</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;You can only get a refund for an unused Simple Delivery postage label if you were the one who originally paid for the unused Simple Delivery postage! So yes, if you're planning to circumvent Simple Delivery (which is exactly what I've been doing too), then it's recommended you offer free postage, so you can then claim back the cost for the unused Simple Delivery postage label.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you had the buyer pay for the postage instead, then they'd automatically receive a refund for the unused postage instead (after 14 days of it not being used).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that makes sense. Cheers : )&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2025 10:18:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dls-online</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-08T10:18:16Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

