<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Loosing sales as i can not combine postage in Seller Central</title>
    <link>https://community.ebay.co.uk/t5/Seller-Central/Loosing-sales-as-i-can-not-combine-postage/m-p/7855027#M734986</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;'That is correct,&amp;nbsp; eBay would refund the buyer if the seller used Simple Delivery.&amp;nbsp; The refund for the unused label would take 30 days to appear back with the buyer.'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well that works fine getting the over paid postage back to the buyer (if they were the ones who paid it...)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But we are still stuck with only one tracking number (therefore one item) being 'delivered' and hence paid within the 14 days, and a dodgy buyer being able to claim not-received for the other items in the box..... as they haven't been 'delivered' .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They've been 'working on it' for 4/5 months now;&amp;nbsp; I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but even I'm starting to think they don't *want* to solve it......&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":frowning_face:"&gt;☹️&lt;/span&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just don't get why *any* business would want to pee off so many of it's own customers; what are they expecting to gain?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 11:02:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lucy_farmer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-05-20T11:02:15Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

