<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Simple Delivery...Low cost items exempt ..... this is what CS say in Seller Central</title>
    <link>https://community.ebay.co.uk/t5/Seller-Central/Simple-Delivery-Low-cost-items-exempt-this-is-what-CS-say/m-p/7815774#M718479</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This is interesting. I'm selling my collection of 7" singles on this private account.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The average weight is around 100g; most are priced under £10.00, and they are sent in bespoke envelopes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I amend my item weight in all my listings to 90g, I should be able to continue charging postage as I have been (for those items priced at lower than £10.00), which is how the buyers and I would prefer it. Even for those items which weigh a couple of grams over the 100g, the amount I would charge buyers, and the amount I would pay Royal Mail, would both be lower than eBay's SD charges.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any flaws in my logic?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 07:49:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>abrahamtoast</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-04-01T07:49:17Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

