<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Beware Royal Mail Parcel Lockers: there's a fatal design flaw and it will waste your time. in Postage</title>
    <link>https://community.ebay.co.uk/t5/Postage/Beware-Royal-Mail-Parcel-Lockers-there-s-a-fatal-design-flaw-and/m-p/7952580#M65708</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, surely Royal Mail's designers must have known of the issue and the solutions their rivals have. As pointed out by c_of_e84 ,DHL dealt with the matter in Germany over twenty years ago. That's why I call it a design flaw, a basic conceptual mistake from the outset. I am in Edinburgh but the nearest post office is about three miles from here. I was thus delighted to learn about the Royal Mail Parcel Locker facility a five-minute walk away, delighted until aghast when I found it unavailable.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 14:41:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pillarboxred</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-11-04T14:41:48Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

