topic Re: In memory in The Round Table

In memory

j_uk643 — Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:20:42 GMT

To those who perished at Grenfell Towers

Those who were mown down and attacked at Seven Sisters, London Bridge, Westminster, and killed at Manchester etc.

Re: In memory

littleme61_6 — Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:07:30 GMT

My thoughts and prayers are with all the families who lost their loved ones in these horrendous attacks.

Rest in Peace all who lost their lives.

Re: In memory

javikha_4 — Sat, 24 Jun 2017 13:41:26 GMT

£6,000 , the extra cost of non inflammable insulation, which cost approximately 79 lives so far.

Re: In memory

j_uk643 — Fri, 30 Jun 2017 17:01:05 GMT

I wonder why one of the worst avoidable fires in living memory received so little coverage in certain places?

Re: In memory

suzieseaside — Fri, 30 Jun 2017 17:13:33 GMT

Which places?

Re: In memory

j_uk643 — Fri, 30 Jun 2017 17:14:41 GMT

Take a guess

Re: In memory

suzieseaside — Fri, 30 Jun 2017 17:20:47 GMT

Simple question. Never mind.

Re: In memory

j_uk643 — Fri, 30 Jun 2017 17:23:04 GMT

simple and disingenuous

Re: In memory

astrologica — Fri, 30 Jun 2017 17:53:35 GMT

Which places? Coverage of this has reached saturation point.

Re: In memory

j_uk643 — Sat, 01 Jul 2017 09:58:56 GMT

Read above dear

Re: In memory

javikha_4 — Sat, 01 Jul 2017 11:22:17 GMT

Some no matter how ancient, just have no compassion.

Re: In memory

jd.linklater — Sat, 01 Jul 2017 17:47:48 GMT

@j_uk643 wrote:
I wonder why one of the worst avoidable fires in living memory received so little coverage in certain places?

Only trying to read between the lines here but I take it you are making a backhanded comment referring to posters on here. If that is the case why do you think it has received little coverage?

Re: In memory

astrologica — Sat, 01 Jul 2017 18:47:34 GMT

OK sweet pea....I have read the above, and nowhere do you state where you think there hasn't been enough coverage of this story. 'Read above' is not an answer...could you just elaborate a little, and tell us where you think there could have been a bit more coverage?

'Twould be nice to know...

Re: In memory

j_uk643 — Sun, 02 Jul 2017 11:00:04 GMT

I regret you're have difficulties comprehending, but it is an answer, though it may not be in a form or in substance one which you wanted. One doesn't always get what one wants. I would reasonably assume any limited education or basic parental guidance might have instructed you on this point all those years ago, but I am happy to fill in that gap.

Re: In memory

j_uk643 — Sun, 02 Jul 2017 11:02:28 GMT

If that were so, then perhaps you might like to suggest a reason.

Re: In memory

right-then-petal — Sun, 02 Jul 2017 11:52:35 GMT

the press moves on to other storys,theres plenty of em

Re: In memory

astrologica — Sun, 02 Jul 2017 12:51:10 GMT

Cop out!😀😀

Re: In memory

jd.linklater — Sun, 02 Jul 2017 14:35:04 GMT

@j_uk643 wrote:
If that were so, then perhaps you might like to suggest a reason.

Perhaps you'd have been better served by saying exactly what was on your mind when you made your original post.

Re: In memory

j_uk643 — Sun, 02 Jul 2017 15:39:35 GMT

Always a pleasure when some speak their mind, since you know it will be such a small conversation.

Re: In memory

j_uk643 — Sun, 02 Jul 2017 15:41:17 GMT

Nothing to do with the press