topic Re: Dave Lee Travis NOT GUILTY in The Round Table

Dave Lee Travis NOT GUILTY

*.*..lola..*.* — Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:34:40 GMT

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/dave-lee-travis-trial-verdict-3140440

Let's hope he can put all this behind him now and get on with his life!

Re: Dave Lee Travis NOT GUILTY

right-then-petal — Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:15:41 GMT

thats 3 free and 1 jailed

who,s next

Re: Dave Lee Travis NOT GUILTY

cee-dee — Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:49:58 GMT

Rolf Harris and Fred Talbot (TV weatherman).

Re: Dave Lee Travis NOT GUILTY

tommy.irene — Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:53:52 GMT

Dave Lee Travis cleared of indecent assault charges

DAVE Lee Travis has been cleared of 12 counts of indecent assault.

The jury at London's Southwark Crown Court has failed to reach verdicts on two other charges.

There will be a further hearing at the same court on February 24 to decide if there should be a retrial of the two outstanding charges.

Read more: http://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/Dave...#ixzz2tDOq7RZH

Re: Dave Lee Travis NOT GUILTY

kiss*my*pixel — Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:09:12 GMT

My exact comments on the William Roache thread also apply here.

(A thread which you started, Lola, with exactly the same opening words, and a thread to which you never returned, incidentally). Just an observation . . .

Re: Dave Lee Travis NOT GUILTY

rose2008-2008 — Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:13:26 GMT

Sorry,,,,,,,,,,,,, dont believe hes innocent. There is another mighty hand at work here somewhere. I just cannot see why people would say that he did things to them if he did not!!!!.

Re: Dave Lee Travis NOT GUILTY

cee-dee — Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:15:14 GMT

He's not been "found innocent" he's been found "Not Guilty beyond reasonable doubt".

Re: Dave Lee Travis NOT GUILTY

tommy.irene — Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:35:58 GMT

@right-then-petal wrote:
thats 3 free and 1 jailed

The only reason he was jailed was he pleaded Guilty..

Re: Dave Lee Travis NOT GUILTY

tommy.irene — Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:38:23 GMT

@right-then-petal wrote:
thats 3 free and 1 jailed

who,s next

May be Tony Blackburn or Cliff Richard or Tony Blair.. who knows ..watch this space..

Re: Dave Lee Travis NOT GUILTY

*.*..lola..*.* — Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:26:12 GMT

@right-then-petal wrote:
thats 3 free and 1 jailed

who,s next

Rolf Harris is the only one left awaiting trial AFAIK, Petal and Jimmy Tarbuck, Paul Gambaccini and someone else are still waiting to find out if they are going to be charged.

#5 (A thread which you started, Lola, with exactly the same opening words, and a thread to which you never returned, incidentally)

And?

#6 I just cannot see why people would say that he did things to them if he did not!!!!

Who knows, Rose but bandwagon springs to my mind sadly

Re: Dave Lee Travis NOT GUILTY

*.*..lola..*.* — Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:28:19 GMT

Blimey, CeeDee I just saw your post..Fred Talbot?? I must have missed that story for crying out loud!!

Re: Dave Lee Travis NOT GUILTY

merehazle — Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:35:39 GMT

@:rose2008-2008 wrote:
Sorry,,,,,,,,,,,,, dont believe hes innocent. There is another mighty hand at work here somewhere. I just cannot see why people would say that he did things to them if he did not!!!!.

'There is another Mighty hand at work here somewhere.' And if Rose says that, that's the way it is. Ahem..................

Well now you have told everyone Rose.

Well here he is if you want to STRETCH a point.

Re: Dave Lee Travis NOT GUILTY

sir_arthur_strebe-grebling — Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:05:01 GMT

As with Roache, the Police and CPS piled together as many charges as they could, hoping they could smear the defendant and make people assume he must be guilty.

Thankfully, the jury, in both cases, saw through this ploy, and found that the 'evidence' was insufficient to convict Roache and Travis.

Re: Dave Lee Travis NOT GUILTY

devin.hilla — Fri, 14 Feb 2014 04:30:33 GMT

@rose2008-2008 wrote:
Sorry,,,,,,,,,,,,, dont believe hes innocent. There is another mighty hand at work here somewhere. I just cannot see why people would say that he did things to them if he did not!!!!.

They smelled MONEY !!!!!!!!!

Why didn't they come forward when it allegedly (or in this case DIDN'T) happen ??

Re: Dave Lee Travis NOT GUILTY

tommy.irene — Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:41:17 GMT

@tommy.irene wrote:
@right-then-petal wrote:
thats 3 free and 1 jailed

who,s next
May be Tony Blackburn or Cliff Richard or Tony Blair.. who knows ..watch this space..

I forgot about Max C.

Re: Dave Lee Travis NOT GUILTY

tommy.irene — Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:11:08 GMT

They lost as they have to pay legal cost and the police pay nothing... they should claim against the police for court costs..

Re: Dave Lee Travis NOT GUILTY

kiss*my*pixel — Fri, 14 Feb 2014 22:43:13 GMT

@sir_arthur_strebe-grebling wrote:
As with Roache, the Police and CPS piled together as many charges as they could, hoping they could smear the defendant and make people assume he must be guilty.

Thankfully, the jury, in both cases, saw through this ploy, and found that the 'evidence' was insufficient to convict Roache and Travis.

As with Roache, the police and CPS gathered as much evidence as they could, confident they could rightly accuse the defendant and rightly charge said defendant with horrid crimes, yet they were foiled by a lawyer who was more adept in finding loopholes (possibly someone like Nick Freeman??)

Sadly, the jury, in both cases, were duped by the extremely adept, incredibly highly-paid lawyer (hired by the defendants, obviously, who have more money and can afford to do so), and found that the evidence was (tragically) insufficient to reach the justified verdict.

Re: Dave Lee Travis NOT GUILTY

cee-dee — Fri, 14 Feb 2014 22:53:50 GMT

Reading the responses to the Roache thread and this one, I wouldn't like to face a jury comprised of some of the respondents.

Re: Dave Lee Travis NOT GUILTY

kiss*my*pixel — Fri, 14 Feb 2014 22:57:24 GMT

Only if you were guilty (or not innocent)

Re: Dave Lee Travis NOT GUILTY

kiss*my*pixel — Fri, 14 Feb 2014 23:01:47 GMT

Reading some of the responses I wouldn't like to face a jury comprised of some of the respondents either (as opposed to my views, obviously)