BBE Policy– System EDD vs Seller Policy: Why Are International Sellers Held Responsible? | Postage

wonder_deal · 2026-04-08T20:12:07.950000Z

Hello .I am seeking clarity from UK sellers and moderators regarding how performance is evaluated under system-generated EDD.In my case, I have consistently: Met handling time requirementsShipped on time with valid carrier scans• Selected only the predefined shipping services available• Delivered within the declared 10 to 22 working day policyDespite this, buyers are shown a significantly shorter system-generated EDD, which is not directly controlled by the seller.eBay Help clearly states:“The estimated delivery date shown to buyers… is based on various factors, including handling time and the delivery or courier services you offer… The calculation is dynamic…”This creates a critical contradiction:Sellers do NOT set the final EDD• EDD is influenced by system-level factors outside seller control• Buyers rely on the system-generated timeline• INR cases are triggered based on that timelineAdditional context (already raised with eBay support):Under an active Service Request (SR# 1-502535434845), this issue has already been formally raised with eBay support, where I clarified that:• Orders were shipped within handling time• Valid tracking with timely carrier scans was uploaded• Deliveries were completed within the declared shipping policyThere was no seller-side fault or non-compliance; delays, where applicable, occurred post-dispatch and outside seller control.Multiple cases were closed in seller’s favour, with confirmed delivery and no seller fault. specifically:Whether INR cases arising solely due to system-generated EDD (despite full seller compliance) can still contribute to account warnings or restrictionsWhether such cases can be reviewed in context, especially when they occur in a clustered timeframe linked to external disruptionsHowever, responses received focused only on system recording of BBE, without addressing the core issue of accountability vs system-generated timelines.Core concern:Buyers initiate INR cases based on system-generated EDD, while sellers are evaluated on controllable factors, creating a clear gap between system-driven expectations and seller accountability.This concern is strictly limited to INR cases within BBE evaluation, where there is no SNAD issue or seller fulfilment failure involved.If the final EDD is system-generated and only influenced (not controlled) by seller inputs, then:👉 On what logical basis are sellers held fully responsible in BBE evaluation, when outcomes driven by system-generated timelines can escalate to account restrictions?This is not a courier issue. This is not a handling time issue.This is a system vs accountability mismatch.When sellers can only:• Select predefined shipping services• Set handling time…but cannot directly control the final EDD shown to buyers, then:👉 How is seller performance fairly evaluated in such cases?I would appreciate insights from experienced sellers or moderators on how this is handled in practice. Thank you. The following screenshots show the system-generated EDD appearing before handling time completion, alongside the seller-defined delivery policy.

Discussions

BBE Policy– System EDD vs Seller Policy: Why Are International Sellers Held Responsible? | Postage | eBay UK