<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Question Unfair Refusal of Combined Postage in Member To Member Support DO NOT DELETE</title>
    <link>https://community.ebay.co.uk/t5/Member-To-Member-Support-DO-NOT/Unfair-Refusal-of-Combined-Postage/qaq-p/4711188</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;** Adding this here, as I cannot find a place to reply to the comments made so far **&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Yes, those who said I should have checked before bidding are quite correct; I hold my hand up and admit that I didn't.&lt;/STRONG&gt; But when I sell items, I charge people ONLY WHAT THE POSTAGE COSTS ME, and if they have overpaid, even by 50p or so I refund the difference (maybe I am too honest?).&amp;nbsp; I just thought that £6.50 to post 2 small t shirts is a bit rich - no one can say the seller was not making a profit there! Even if it is not a WRITTEN rule, surely it is an UNWRITTEN one to be honest in your dealings? &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;(FOR EXAMPLE:&amp;nbsp; People who advertise something starting at 99p (to avoid eBay costs) then state a tenner for postage on an item that would cost £3.30 to post are surely taking the p*** big style - it may not be against the rules, but it smacks loudly of dishonesty. Again, maybe I have too much integrity!)&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Also, to me "everyone does it" does not make anything right! &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ORIGINAL POST ... (THE ABOVE, IN ITALICS IS MY RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS AS I CANNOT FIND A 'REPLY' BUTTON)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, just had a problem with a buyer. I "won" 2 small t shirts from the seller, postage was listed as £3 on one item and £3.50 on the other. When I won them I asked what the postage would be and the seller refused to make any reduction in postage. This meant the seller was charging £6.50 to post 2 small t shirts!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did manage to get the order cancelled, but surely this is not allowed? To post both the t shirts would have cost £3.30 first class mail, and I think that seller was actually going to send them second class!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know what the rules are about this, because it is really unfair for people to be making a profit on postage like this. I would maybe let a few pence go, but charging double what first class postage would have been really is taking the pi**&amp;nbsp; !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, would be interested to know what others think.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 14:39:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bennybabybear2013</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-03-04T14:39:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Unfair Refusal of Combined Postage</title>
      <link>https://community.ebay.co.uk/t5/Member-To-Member-Support-DO-NOT/Unfair-Refusal-of-Combined-Postage/qaq-p/4711188</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;** Adding this here, as I cannot find a place to reply to the comments made so far **&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Yes, those who said I should have checked before bidding are quite correct; I hold my hand up and admit that I didn't.&lt;/STRONG&gt; But when I sell items, I charge people ONLY WHAT THE POSTAGE COSTS ME, and if they have overpaid, even by 50p or so I refund the difference (maybe I am too honest?).&amp;nbsp; I just thought that £6.50 to post 2 small t shirts is a bit rich - no one can say the seller was not making a profit there! Even if it is not a WRITTEN rule, surely it is an UNWRITTEN one to be honest in your dealings? &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;(FOR EXAMPLE:&amp;nbsp; People who advertise something starting at 99p (to avoid eBay costs) then state a tenner for postage on an item that would cost £3.30 to post are surely taking the p*** big style - it may not be against the rules, but it smacks loudly of dishonesty. Again, maybe I have too much integrity!)&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Also, to me "everyone does it" does not make anything right! &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ORIGINAL POST ... (THE ABOVE, IN ITALICS IS MY RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS AS I CANNOT FIND A 'REPLY' BUTTON)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, just had a problem with a buyer. I "won" 2 small t shirts from the seller, postage was listed as £3 on one item and £3.50 on the other. When I won them I asked what the postage would be and the seller refused to make any reduction in postage. This meant the seller was charging £6.50 to post 2 small t shirts!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did manage to get the order cancelled, but surely this is not allowed? To post both the t shirts would have cost £3.30 first class mail, and I think that seller was actually going to send them second class!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know what the rules are about this, because it is really unfair for people to be making a profit on postage like this. I would maybe let a few pence go, but charging double what first class postage would have been really is taking the pi**&amp;nbsp; !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, would be interested to know what others think.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 14:39:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ebay.co.uk/t5/Member-To-Member-Support-DO-NOT/Unfair-Refusal-of-Combined-Postage/qaq-p/4711188</guid>
      <dc:creator>bennybabybear2013</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-04T14:39:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

